Monday, 31 August 2009

Texas Chain Saw Massacre - Live Commentary


Hi gang. Can't take credit for this as it was Mr B’s idea to literally transcribe what we say during one of our film viewings, in the style of a DVD commentary, or more like the “Couch Poato” sections of genre magazines etc. To clarify for you this has been edited, for the sake of my sanity and yours, however I will telegraph where the film is as we speak (it only occasionally corresponds though so be warned and obviously SPOILER WARNING). MM is myself, the pointing goon in the picture above and MB is Mr Butterscotch, who I’m pointing at. Let’s dig in, enjoy...

The movie kicks off and we meet our group of teens on a road trip driving through Texas.

MM: It’s quite telling how the first thing they change here is to ditch the disabled guy from the original movie, he obviously wouldnt fit into our P.C world.

MB: That’s nonsense dude, he only wouldn't fit into the P.C World in the sense that he wouldn’t be down the local computer store.

MM: ...Still I think it also speaks volumes that they change the reason for the protagonists being there from going to Texas for a funeral to driving through Texas on the way back from Mexico after partying hard and getting drugs, feeds into the whole punishment of amorality thing Im always going on about as a cliche in these films. It's notable too how the first lines of character dialogue are about sex and STD’s, and we see these guys smoking pot, the virtuous “final girl” type being all against it.

The gang meets a female wandering down a road and stops to pick her up.

MM: I vividly remember this crazy hitchhiker who pulls a gun out of... herself, and blows her brains out. Weird.

MB: How do they know something's wrong? Why stop anyway? Doesn't she cut somebody first and that’s when it all kicks off.

MM: No you’re thinking of the original, fairly tamer scene actually, the same equivalent character just cuts the disabled guy and gets thrown out, here there are whole beats and scenes about her having killed herself and what they should do about it, kicks off the plot and strands them in the hick town, alerts them to the weirdness.

MB: Why is the whole town in on it?

MM: They’re all related to Leatherface. It’s a horrible coincidence. But the whole town? Why actually are they all evil or mental, I know we were told in Film class it was about the decline of jobs and the working classes etc.

MB: Yeah it’s just attacking rural towns and working class back water families. It’s just social commentary.

MM: It’s rubbish social commentary.

MB: Agreed... Check out the van, that's a Dodge. You’d get a fair few miles to the gallon out of that bad boy.

MM: Alright Clarkson, let’s watch.

MB: Man Jessica Biel can't act but she sure has great t*ts.

MM: Agreed but dude.

MB: Woah man, look at them bounce (NB: this was repeated almost ad nauseum every time said actress was on screen, I shan’t transcribe every single example)

At this point we have reached the Hewitt residence and the folk outdoors have discovered something...

MM: What is that?

MB: It’s a girl in a jar.

It is, in fact, a picture of a girl, and her family, in a jar.

MM: I can’t believe you were right.

Inexplicably two of the group stumble round Leatherface's house, to much confusion. Eventually the man himself makes his appearance.

MB: I knew they re-did the sequence where he steps out, clobbers a guy then slams a door shut. Much less effective here though.

MM: True but the final image is exactly the same. Iconic. Plus this film gains points for not finishing up with a girl running away screeching for a solid half hour.

MB: That was annoying, and the shit with the grandpa. Eurgh.

We cut to Leatherface’s lair and among the victims' body parts we clearly see the head of famous film geek Harry Knowles.

MB: Knowles!?

MM: Man I always forget that, its the kind of thing I like to tell people, apparently Knowles tore this film a new one and that’s their revenge.

Leatherface uncovers an engagement ring on his latest victim.

MM: Ah, he was gonna propose. I’m affected all emotionally like. (NB: Sarcasm)

MB: What does he want with that? He’s keeping it. Obviously gonna use it for a c@”k ring.

We see a scene of Leatherface’s real face, it does not look good.

MB: It’s Zombie Chunk! “Hey you guys. Thunk!”

An ineffectual death or two later and we wind up back in the lair where we now follow Biel as she witnesses the strung up, suffering body of the blonde teen Mr B has christened “Bruno”

MM: What’s with the crucafixation imagery? Why is that there? I find that quite offensive.

MB: Why?

MM: Because they aren’t trying to say anything, it’s just risque imagery for its own sake, like its supposed to shock you. And why does she have to kill him, I hate that all good guys have to have a bit of bad, some darkness in them, it’s why nobody can make a good Superman film, people can’t accept there are genuinely good people who are good for good reasons.

MB: It’s a blooding, like the hunt. She has to be strong enough to take on and kill the bad guys.

MM: Is it some kind of comment on euthanasia?

MB: You’re reading far too much into this, remember “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”

Biel is chased through to a hut along with the one victim she hasn’t finished off for the baddies

MM: I just remembered this is the guy who directed the Friday the 13th remake. You see what I mean about the monochrome lens, with like a sepia filter. It’s fine for rural Texas in the 70’s but a modern, bright, sunny, summer camp.

MB: It’s all the downtrodden working class.

MM: ...

MB: Nobody in the 70’s looked as hot as these guys anyhow.

Leatherface finishes off a guy by chain saw through the crotch.

MM: OH!!! I both love and hate that scene.

MB: You don’t see anything!! If this was an extreme french or japanese film you would see him split in two and drop in two halves.

MM: I still think its effective, we differ a lot on that point, I don't think you have to see as much.

Biel is now chased through the abbatoir we passed earlier. Leatherface ploughs through two folds of hanging meaty corpse to attack her.

MM: That scene seemed quite phallic. Not sure it was intentional though. Maybe it was a metaphorical invasion of female power though for which he ends up neutered by losing an arm...?

Biel steals back a baby she met earlier and escapes, inviting comparisons to the original film, and it’s superior effectiveness again. The last scene I demand pause for and dig again as we get a final shock...

MB: Yeah not bad. Still enjoyable, decent. *** stars

MM: I might even go to ****

MB: I couldn’t man.

MM: Well i think so, yeah very good, still like it.

MM

Review - Saw 2


Hello again fear mongers. Mr B and I decided on an impromptu horror double bill when hanging out last night and now Im sharing the resulting thoughts, views and opinions with you faithful few frighteners. Stay tuned for a special piece on Texas Chain Saw Massacre (the remake) in a style you haven’t seen before but first our more traditional thoughts and my review of the first film we watched, Saw 2.
I was surprised I talked Mr B into this but my excitable descriptions of pieces I recalled (I remembered quite digging this before) convinced him, so in the disc went, we munched on petrol station snacks, as has become the norm, and the logo’s played, much to Mr B’s approval, oh how things went downhill from there.
The film opens with a trap in progress (SPOILER ALERT – If you haven’t seen Saw 2 and ever plan on coming to it fresh then stop reading right now!). This involves a hapless victim having to gouge out his eye to retrieve a key to a death “mask” laden with spikes which will snap shut on him in a few seconds. Supposedly this is his poetic justice for having used his peepers to spy on people as an informant. I’m not ashamed to say I still think this scene and trap are incredible, you truly feel for the guy and put yourself in that horrendous position, the first thing through my mind being that I couldnt do it, pondered every time I see him reach for the eyeball with a blade. This also struck me as quite clever, it’s misdirection in a sense since you’re expecing an Un Chien Andalou style eye slicing but it doesnt happen, you’re left reeling as a viewer, disgusted by the idea of it but wanting it to happen so the poor guy can free himself, it’s almost cathartic and relieving when the mask snaps shut, reminiscent of a scene in Mask of Satan, a reference for the hardcore horror fanatics. Mr B looked nonplussed here but his opinion wasnt shared so on we ploughed.
We next launch into exposition setting up the cop characters, once Mr B had got over who both actors were (despite initial disbelief that it was Marky Mark Wahlberg’s brother and the chick from Starship Troopers) he concentrated, regretting it later but that’s to come. There was some hand wringing and excitement when we finally got to the meat of the story, meeting our protagonists all trapped in a house together. Lets deal with these sections of the film first...
Most of the traps Mr B found ridiculous, and it has to be said they dont hold up to logical analysis or scrutiny. I forgive a lot due to the fact the people here were clearly never meant to leave the first room but as Mr B pointed out with regards to a different matter its human nature not to sit around when you think you’re dying. That said he did visibly flinch twice, something I have NEVER seen him do as a hardened horror nut, due to his dislike of needles in one case, I forget the second.
It was during the more “police procedural” parts with Jigsaw and Detective Matthews that Mr B really expressed his distaste of what passed for a plot, completely disregarding the villains motivations and “logic”, its hard to disagree in part but I still find it cool at times in the series, and its not necessarily what they are about.
In conclusion not as good as I rememebered but still a worthy effort, some effective moments of emotional affectation, good plot beats and twists for me, and a few great traps and gore moments. My personal score...

*** (3/5)



MM

News/Reviews - Argento does giallo... badly!?


Hi all, MM back in action. Apologies if it seems like shameless plugging but I'm afraid I have to once again link to a piece on AICN. In it the contributor "Dr William Weir" has posted a first review of Dario Argento's Giallo from the Fright Fest in our fair country. Be warned the piece contains very minor spoilers and is not kind. This saddens me as it is the first time this movie has been brought to my attention and I would hope for better, Argento's giallo's are my favourite of his movies, preferable to the more crazy supernatural efforts, in fact Profondo Rosso (Deep Red) remains one of my favourite horror movies. I may still hold out some hope for this one, its a personal fan boy thing.



MM

Saturday, 29 August 2009

News - Weekend Round-Up

Hi all. MM back on a particularly bored night, thought I may as well share a couple of new tidbits with you.
First of all the staff of AICN have posted their first official opinion on Rob Zombie's Halloween 2. I don't plan on linking to every one of these but this is a particularly good read, a very interesting piece and this guy Massawyrm seems to know what he's talking about and have as much love and respect for the genre as we here do.
Secondly as you'll see in the review if you check it out it's been announced that Zombie will be helming a remake of seminal horror "classic" The Blob, only apparently without the traditional representation of the titular amorphous monster, which he claims is too cheesy and wouldn't be accepted by audiences today. I really don't like this idea, The Blob never struck me as a great film anyway except in terms of a certain trashy B movie aesthetic (and an appearance by the legendary Steve McQueen in the original), a remake might be more suited to the likes of Robert Rodriguez or a director with similar sensibilities who isn't afraid to embrace the kitsch and corny. My opinion of the one Zombie film I've seen, Halloween, is well documented on the site and not wholly negative, but does lead me to expect the Blob to be a misunderstood shape-changing alien bounty hunter who was abused by his step parent from a warring species of intellectual inferiors. Still it is happening, you never know it could be worth a watch. Up to now Im totally indifferent to this news though, sorry fans.
MM

Wednesday, 26 August 2009

Harper's Island - Coming Soon


Last post for today folks I promise.
Been seeing trailers for this new 13 episode show Harper's Island that's going to be coming to BBC Three (imported from the States of course). It looks a bit like a slasher film done as a tv series in that it is a murder mystery where the cast are picked off one by one. The viewer seemingly has to figure out the murderer along with the characters. Sounds very intriguing, keep an eye on your digital listings around Sept 6th and watch the trailer here...



or check out the spoiler heavy wikipedia page here

MM

Halloween 2 - First Reviews


Hi again. A reader and contributor over at Ain't It Cool who attended the premiere of Rob Zombie's sequel has posted their first review. Although the folks over at AICN seem to be united in their loathing of the original Zombie Halloween I have to say I quite liked it in a way. Likewise despite this review tearing the sequel a new one it oddly made me just want to go see it. I am a troubled horror geek. Find the piece by following the linkage below...

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/42155

MM

The Grudge 2 - Thoughts


Hi again all. Apologies for the lack of material of late but I have been coping with some personal issues which have kept me somewhat out of the emotional state for horror. Proving that good friends and the genre are always there for you though it was during this time that Mr B came round, bought me petrol station snacks and we decided to (finally) watch this, since I picked it up at the store where I work for a steal at just £2. To warn you I may be cutting it some slack due to my mood (which may skew things unfairly against the film).
I started off being quite harsh towards the movie, and to be fair there are a lot of cliches, hallmarked shock and scare moments (none of which are scary and only a couple of which are spooky, be warned early), some abysmal dialogue and some truly awful special effects and plot contrivances. Lets try and deal with the movie in a linear sense (in terms of what we see, the film is mind-messingly non-linear, even more so than the first).
The opening scene is like a more brutal and violent rehash of the seeming suicide moment from the first movie, immediately leaving you with questions and not allowing you to ease back into this world, perhaps a bit more work, a link to the previous characters (Sarah Michelle Gellar is utilised later), or at least an appearance by the ghostly protagonists (of which there are plenty later, mostly lacking in effective atmosphere but some genius).
We next flash to our new lead girl (or what passes for one). In this case it is Amber Tamblyn, the sister of Karen (S.M.G) from the first movie and, for seemingly NO reason, it is set up that she has a torrid relationship with their mother and her sister. It's possibly supposed to add depth, and we do learn later some guff about them wanting her to go to a certain college, it's really not in any way effective. This is probably a scripting issue if I had to place blame.
At this point my memory is hazy, I recall being ambivalent towards the messed up time structure, loving seeing some of the kills (though the cleverest moments are rehashes of those seen in the original US or Japanese Grudge (ghost under the covers, chasing you as the lights go out etc). There were some great ones though which Mr B can attest I loved, or at least admired, and I shan't spoil them.
The direction is fantastic, but I expected nothing less from the man responsible for single handedly overseeing two countries' versions of this story, one Shimizu Takashi (who created the story, writing the vastly superior, excellent and original Ju-On)
I hated the unnecessary (and disregarded) added exposition about why Kayako became how she was (her mother implanted her with evil spirits, no seriously), it is ridiculous, takes away some of the cool, supernatural mystique and is thrown away out of hand as untrue even within the film.
Likewise the film's ending, whilst maybe seeming arty merely leaves you thinking that the whole event was a bit pointless. I don't normally feel this way but here it jars that nothing has moved on, more people you could not really form a connection with have died and the curse has spread to another country, with the implication that it will continue to. Our lead "final girl" makes no attempt to solve this quandary as it has been so well set up as an unstoppable force so it feels like just rehashing and treading water. I fear for where the 3rd movie could take this as I don't see any logical progression.
However as I say I love how the whole thing looked, the narative and its unusual form did keep you hooked as you tried to work out connections etc, half of the cast do well and the moments are enjoyable enough. It's hard to give specific reasons why but I know I enjoyed this more than the last Friday the 13th, the last thing I reviewed. Maybe Im just not as protective a fan, or being generous. Or perhaps its just that Mr B and I agreed when setting up the site that we wouldnt allow half marks. In any case a solid, non-offensive example of the J-horror spook, done USA style, not bad but not especially good...

*** (3/5)

MM