Thursday, 24 August 2017

The Keep - A quick retrospective review with some personal points


I have been a fan of horror for just about as long as I remember.  I have, in fact, been a horror fan probably longer than some of you have been alive.  One of my earliest memories of watching a horror film is that of The Keep.

My memories of the film are thus - a Nazi regiment takes over a keep.  This is the titular keep of the title.  After some troops die, a more awful Nazi regiment arrives.  In the meantime a something (I always took it to be a demon) is released and kills the Nazis.  In my memory, the demon is almost the good guy.  I mean he prevents the gang rape of Eva Cuza (played by Alberta Watson).  He kills a lot of Nazis.  However, my naive young brain (and so addled memories) missed the subtext.  That being, the demon was manipulating me, as well as Doctor Cuza.  When this is revealed, things go very wrong in the film.

On viewing again a few times, there is rather more to the film.  Firstly, I would point out that I firmly believe that the acting still holds up.  Ian McKellen may be a little strained at times, but I was captivated in particular by the presentation of Jurgen Prochnow.  Scott Glenn was also effective as Glaeken.  He was suitably strange and creepy.  Perhaps otherworldly is the best description, given he is perhaps angelic in nature in this movie.

Modern audiences may well be slightly turned off by the poor special effects of this film.  Whilst I enjoy The Keep, I am not a fool nor a sycophant.  Times change and effects do too.  In movies, we want to be absorbed and believe in the world that is being presented.  Unfortunately, I cannot state that this is the case with The Keep.  The opposite is the case with this film.  The drawn/animated effects show poorly, whilst the physical effects actually hold up.

I for one am glad that The Keep has not made the modern reboot list (at least at time of writing, August 2017).  I still believe that it stands the test of time better than many other films of recent release.  The concept is disturbing, the use of evil manipulating good offers a metaphor that modern audiences can understand.

My final verdict remains that Michael Mann's The Keep demonstrates that he is an auteur of the highest order.  Only a true visionary could produce something so deeply concerning, historically troubling and also relevant to a modern audience.

Final verdict: 4/5.

Tuesday, 22 August 2017

The Windmill Massacre - Review


I watched The Windmill Massacre over two sittings.  I'm not sure that this is the UK DVD box art but it certainly sums up the film rather well.  Make of that what you will.  There's no certification shown but I can confirm that the general release cut is 18 rated.

The Windmill Massacre is set in Holland and features a bunch of tourists who have all elected to get on a tour bus for a bit of a jaunt into the countryside, to take in some culture that isn't the red light district or cannabis cafes.  This is where things go very wrong.  It is quickly revealed that each character has a somewhat shady past and it literally comes back to haunt them.  Their lives are then put in danger by the thing from the box art shown above.

I'll just get it out there at this point in the review - this is a budget film in the sense that it is quite clearly made to a very specific price point.  I have no issue with watching a bit of shlock now and again and I'll presume that you don't either, given that you are reading Thursday The 12th.

That being said, better decisions could have been made on timing, special effects, pacing etc.  The first death in the film is so quick and so graphic - with requisite ropey effects - it'll probably have you in shock.  Just not in a good way.  Things that could have been hinted at are shown fully on camera.  This exposes the effects for what they are, namely often unimpressive to the point of silly.

The cast seem to be reasonably well chosen and each brings a suitable grimace of horror when presented with the 'sin' of their past.  Some pull off their wince-inducing death scenes better than others.  The acting, like the effects, leaves something to be desired.

I don't often write that there are no single redeeming features about any movie or TV show and I'm not about to start now.  I would say however that this is an unfortunate exercise in what could have been.  If the film makers demonstrated more care and subtlety in their art, perhaps even cutting out the jump scares completely, we might have had something far more interesting to watch.  Instead, we have a bit of a muddled monster-of-the-week story blended with some black magic and good old fashioned serial killer stalking.

Possibly best enjoyed if you have visited a cannabis cafe and had some absinthe for good measure.

Final score: 1.5/5.

Thursday, 27 July 2017

Midnight, Texas - Series 1, Episode 1 quick review


Now, I don't tend to watch 'this kind of thing as my Marvel Man will tell you.  Anything cliched looking with an overly attractive, young and generic cast I tend to avoid.  Throw in some 'supernatural lite' and I definitely run a mile the other way.  Imagine my surprise then when I caught the pilot of Midnight, Texas and actually enjoyed it.

The storyline follows Manfred Bernardo, a psychic on the run from someone or other.  That bit isn't really that important as it only serves as a plot device to get him to the town of Midnight.  What is more significant is that Manfred is a 'real' psychic and he communicates with the dead on a regular basis.

To cut a expository episode short, Manfred meets the various occupants of the town.  He discovers that they are far more than they seem and that he is not the only person with supernatural abilities.  Queue the vampire, witch, angel and much more to add spice to the show.  Each has their own dubious past and various dramatic problems which will no doubt be explored in future episodes.

The tone of the show begins in quite a sinister/dark fashion, what with Manfred being possessed by a spirit and almost attacking the person he's doing a psychic reading for.  Whilst it does have plenty of jump scares, it manages to throw in plenty of humour as well.  It isn't brooding, but it does have a good sense of drama about it.

The question with a pilot episode should always be: 'will I tune in for episode two?'  In this case, I have set the planner already to catch the next one.  I'm not suggesting it will blow your mind with greatest but it was a decent watch.  Whilst that might seem a bit of a negative, if you realise that I'm more Penny Dreadful than I am Buffy The Vampire Slayer and you'll see it's high praise indeed.

Final score: 3.5/5.


Wednesday, 17 May 2017

Alien: Covenant - Review


SPOILER LEVEL: AMBER 
In this review I will try and stay relatively spoiler- free but may discuss broader themes and story beats which you may not want to know if you want to go into this film as a completely blank slate. As a general rule of thumb also be warned that if it's in trailers or preview material then it's fair game

Additionally this review will contain some adult language, fair warning here. Although you're on a horror site reading a review of a scary movie so I feel like it's morally dubious of you to complain about naughty words, we're all adults here (hopefully).

Alien: Covenant sees director Ridley Scott return to the franchise he helped create in 1979 with Alien and has seemingly taken a stranglehold of since returning in 2012 with Prometheus. However, whilst that film was essentially a giant Alien franchise cock-tease, this movie earns it's title and stands as a full-fledged Alien movie with the titular star beast present and correct after it's absence in the previous movie. To continue the analogy though I could have done with much less foreplay in this movie, less of the gentle, tantric stuff and a faster, harder route to climax. Hopefully once you've seen this movie you'll understand what I mean with this laboured metaphor but I'll try and take the film as it unfolds (avoiding heavy spoilers) and say what I found good and bad.


The first half an hour of the film seems to exemplify everything that I see as problematic of Ridley Scott as a filmmaker. I have always thought him slightly overrated (your opinion may vary) and part of that is the naval-gazing, laboured film- making that happens here. The info we need could be presented here in under 5 minutes (there's a colony ship heading to a new planet, an accident occurs, they pick up a signal) but seriously what you just read there takes thirty minutes of screen time! Bits of what it shows set up atmosphere or tone but a lot of it feels like plodding, treading water as if Ridley wants you to stop at a cool visual and pause for an "ooooooh" audience reaction. This time could also be potentially used to set up characters but sadly beyond the main two or three the others may as well be wearing red Star Trek uniforms with name badges reading "cannon fodder". It's also baffling that two or three big name actors have what amounts to walk-on cameos, or less. Having said that, the world building does suck you in but after the previous movie I was a little bored and worried.

I needn't have been as harsh as things improve dramatically once our protagonists get on planetary ground. There are touches of the better parts of Prometheus here with a much healthier dose of Alien DNA and it's so good to see Scott do those gory, monster movie moments and scares. There's even a scene with a locked door that managed to illicit tension, even in this eighth movie in a franchise and some new twists on old tropes that shouldn't work but do.


The film takes a bit of a pause next and gets to be a sequel for a while, answering some things from Prometheus and furthering that story. As if aware that this could be where he loses the audience this is where Sir Ridley also "plays the hits", delivering on the promise of that Alien title with familiar creatures returning to this universe. You will have seen in the trailer that Billy Cruddup's Oram peers into a recognisable egg. It ends exactly as badly as you'd think and when that occurs you can almost sense the film again stopping for an audience reaction, cheering the familiar. In an interview about the somewhat lacklustre response to Prometheus Scott was quoted as saying, "they want aliens, I'll give them fucking aliens!" and there were moments in this film where I could almost sense him from behind the screen yelling "There! Happy now?". There are attempts to add new elements too though which is admirable but let down by some shoddy CGI at times. A couple of things illicited laughter in my screening that definitely shouldn't have, which rather kills the mood at times.

There are a handful of good jump scares and great horror as the film develops further. Here it also becomes apparent that we are watching a film that's as much about the duality and conflict of man vs machine than humanity fighting against biological evils. Giger's original design for the titular xenomorph was bio-mechanical and these themes go back to Scott's work with Ash in the original Alien or tyre entirety of Blade Runner. Lots of moments actually evoke that film for me. It's done well though and thoughtfully and tonally doesn't stand out as much as it should.

The films latter stages seem like Ridley Scott attempting to show his version of Aliens as we get into big action sequences and recognisable moments from trailers and previous movies. The end actually recalls the endings of both of the first two Alien movies thus making the film seem like the most legit follow up since James Cameron's masterpiece. I loved this as the movie gave me the gore and horror action I came for but if you want to see something new then maybe lower those expectations.

The film is frustratingly open-ended so if you wanted answers to all of Prometheus' questions or expect to see how that ship full of eggs ended up on LV426 in the original Alien then you will be disappointed. If the search for answers is this entertaining, action-packed, interesting and fun though I'll stay on this Ridley Scott ride.

In short, my third favourite Alien movie (though competition isn't stiff):

***1/2

MM

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

The Mummy (2017) - Trailer and reaction


The Internet became abuzz earlier in the week when a first trailer dropped for the Tom Cruise-starring 2017 version of Universal's The Mummy. For anyone who is unaware, there is extra hype surrounding this movie as it is to serve as the first movie in a newly established "Universal Monsters Shared Universe". Building on the success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe a lot of studios are attempting to create and market their own "shared universe" and since Universal own the rights to Dracula, Frankenstein's monster, the Wolf Man, the Invisible Man etc and were the first to have a shared universe where these monsters encountered each other (and sometimes Abbott and Costello), they are attempting to create a new universe of, as this trailer says, "gods and monsters". The trailer is linked below, along with my thoughts underneath that:

https://youtu.be/IjHgzkQM2Sg

I have to say I am unimpressed with this movie so far overall. It seems to have abandoned the horror genre in favour of a generic action film (similarly to the 1999 movie of the same name) and has a definite "typical Tom Cruise film" vibe.

That said, there are definitely things here which intrigue me. Sofia Boutella as the titular creature looks amazing and seems like a great choice of actress after her roles in Kingsman and Star Trek Beyond revealed great promise. Similarly a little research reveals that the character Russell Crowe is playing is Dr Jekkyl, more interesting casting which will hopefully lead to great things down the line. Finally, I could be wrong but it seems like Tom Cruise's character could somehow be immortal and might then serve as another linking of the planned movies down the line.

I'm apathetic at the moment on this one but intrigued about the overall shared universe it's starting. Stay tuned for more info and opinion as more is revealed.

MM

A Nightmare on Elm Street - Where It Was Made


Good evening horror fans. An interesting piece came up from my You Tube subscriptions today courtesy of JoBlo Movie Network. It's a behind the scenes piece about one of my favourite movies, Wes Craven's original Nightmare on Elm Street. It is from a series of vignettes called "Where It Was Made", specifically focusing on the locations where the movie was filmed, including visiting them in the present day.

This particular episode is around 12 minutes long and features contributions from Heather Langenkamp (Nancy) and Robert England (Freddy Krueger). It's definitely worth a look, especially if you love the film as much as I do:

https://youtu.be/qv7ITgNQC14

Full credit, of course, goes to JoBlo and those credited in the video. I'm not responsible for making any part of it, just a fan. Please leave a like, comment and subscribe to JoBlo if you enjoyed this.

 MM

Monday, 5 December 2016

The Belko Experiment


Hey there reader, an interesting trailer dropped a few days ago that I really wanted to share on here. It's for a film called The Belko Experiment and I think I'll let the trailer speak for itself in summing up what this movie is about:

https://youtu.be/nYsz0lJsOEg

Looks pretty fascinating huh? I actually heard about this film a while ago on the Facebook of it's writer James Gunn but initially didn't think much of it as it sounded a bit too dark and potentially like a brainless gore-fest. But then I saw this trailer and now I'm on board! It looks genuinely fascinating, exploring intriguing psychological depths and examining human nature, as well as being scary in a very realistic sense. I'm really interested to know anyone else's thoughts on this so please comment below or on the Thursday the 12th Facebook page and stay tuned for more info.

MM