Monday 31 August 2009

Texas Chain Saw Massacre - Live Commentary


Hi gang. Can't take credit for this as it was Mr B’s idea to literally transcribe what we say during one of our film viewings, in the style of a DVD commentary, or more like the “Couch Poato” sections of genre magazines etc. To clarify for you this has been edited, for the sake of my sanity and yours, however I will telegraph where the film is as we speak (it only occasionally corresponds though so be warned and obviously SPOILER WARNING). MM is myself, the pointing goon in the picture above and MB is Mr Butterscotch, who I’m pointing at. Let’s dig in, enjoy...

The movie kicks off and we meet our group of teens on a road trip driving through Texas.

MM: It’s quite telling how the first thing they change here is to ditch the disabled guy from the original movie, he obviously wouldnt fit into our P.C world.

MB: That’s nonsense dude, he only wouldn't fit into the P.C World in the sense that he wouldn’t be down the local computer store.

MM: ...Still I think it also speaks volumes that they change the reason for the protagonists being there from going to Texas for a funeral to driving through Texas on the way back from Mexico after partying hard and getting drugs, feeds into the whole punishment of amorality thing Im always going on about as a cliche in these films. It's notable too how the first lines of character dialogue are about sex and STD’s, and we see these guys smoking pot, the virtuous “final girl” type being all against it.

The gang meets a female wandering down a road and stops to pick her up.

MM: I vividly remember this crazy hitchhiker who pulls a gun out of... herself, and blows her brains out. Weird.

MB: How do they know something's wrong? Why stop anyway? Doesn't she cut somebody first and that’s when it all kicks off.

MM: No you’re thinking of the original, fairly tamer scene actually, the same equivalent character just cuts the disabled guy and gets thrown out, here there are whole beats and scenes about her having killed herself and what they should do about it, kicks off the plot and strands them in the hick town, alerts them to the weirdness.

MB: Why is the whole town in on it?

MM: They’re all related to Leatherface. It’s a horrible coincidence. But the whole town? Why actually are they all evil or mental, I know we were told in Film class it was about the decline of jobs and the working classes etc.

MB: Yeah it’s just attacking rural towns and working class back water families. It’s just social commentary.

MM: It’s rubbish social commentary.

MB: Agreed... Check out the van, that's a Dodge. You’d get a fair few miles to the gallon out of that bad boy.

MM: Alright Clarkson, let’s watch.

MB: Man Jessica Biel can't act but she sure has great t*ts.

MM: Agreed but dude.

MB: Woah man, look at them bounce (NB: this was repeated almost ad nauseum every time said actress was on screen, I shan’t transcribe every single example)

At this point we have reached the Hewitt residence and the folk outdoors have discovered something...

MM: What is that?

MB: It’s a girl in a jar.

It is, in fact, a picture of a girl, and her family, in a jar.

MM: I can’t believe you were right.

Inexplicably two of the group stumble round Leatherface's house, to much confusion. Eventually the man himself makes his appearance.

MB: I knew they re-did the sequence where he steps out, clobbers a guy then slams a door shut. Much less effective here though.

MM: True but the final image is exactly the same. Iconic. Plus this film gains points for not finishing up with a girl running away screeching for a solid half hour.

MB: That was annoying, and the shit with the grandpa. Eurgh.

We cut to Leatherface’s lair and among the victims' body parts we clearly see the head of famous film geek Harry Knowles.

MB: Knowles!?

MM: Man I always forget that, its the kind of thing I like to tell people, apparently Knowles tore this film a new one and that’s their revenge.

Leatherface uncovers an engagement ring on his latest victim.

MM: Ah, he was gonna propose. I’m affected all emotionally like. (NB: Sarcasm)

MB: What does he want with that? He’s keeping it. Obviously gonna use it for a c@”k ring.

We see a scene of Leatherface’s real face, it does not look good.

MB: It’s Zombie Chunk! “Hey you guys. Thunk!”

An ineffectual death or two later and we wind up back in the lair where we now follow Biel as she witnesses the strung up, suffering body of the blonde teen Mr B has christened “Bruno”

MM: What’s with the crucafixation imagery? Why is that there? I find that quite offensive.

MB: Why?

MM: Because they aren’t trying to say anything, it’s just risque imagery for its own sake, like its supposed to shock you. And why does she have to kill him, I hate that all good guys have to have a bit of bad, some darkness in them, it’s why nobody can make a good Superman film, people can’t accept there are genuinely good people who are good for good reasons.

MB: It’s a blooding, like the hunt. She has to be strong enough to take on and kill the bad guys.

MM: Is it some kind of comment on euthanasia?

MB: You’re reading far too much into this, remember “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”

Biel is chased through to a hut along with the one victim she hasn’t finished off for the baddies

MM: I just remembered this is the guy who directed the Friday the 13th remake. You see what I mean about the monochrome lens, with like a sepia filter. It’s fine for rural Texas in the 70’s but a modern, bright, sunny, summer camp.

MB: It’s all the downtrodden working class.

MM: ...

MB: Nobody in the 70’s looked as hot as these guys anyhow.

Leatherface finishes off a guy by chain saw through the crotch.

MM: OH!!! I both love and hate that scene.

MB: You don’t see anything!! If this was an extreme french or japanese film you would see him split in two and drop in two halves.

MM: I still think its effective, we differ a lot on that point, I don't think you have to see as much.

Biel is now chased through the abbatoir we passed earlier. Leatherface ploughs through two folds of hanging meaty corpse to attack her.

MM: That scene seemed quite phallic. Not sure it was intentional though. Maybe it was a metaphorical invasion of female power though for which he ends up neutered by losing an arm...?

Biel steals back a baby she met earlier and escapes, inviting comparisons to the original film, and it’s superior effectiveness again. The last scene I demand pause for and dig again as we get a final shock...

MB: Yeah not bad. Still enjoyable, decent. *** stars

MM: I might even go to ****

MB: I couldn’t man.

MM: Well i think so, yeah very good, still like it.

MM

Review - Saw 2


Hello again fear mongers. Mr B and I decided on an impromptu horror double bill when hanging out last night and now Im sharing the resulting thoughts, views and opinions with you faithful few frighteners. Stay tuned for a special piece on Texas Chain Saw Massacre (the remake) in a style you haven’t seen before but first our more traditional thoughts and my review of the first film we watched, Saw 2.
I was surprised I talked Mr B into this but my excitable descriptions of pieces I recalled (I remembered quite digging this before) convinced him, so in the disc went, we munched on petrol station snacks, as has become the norm, and the logo’s played, much to Mr B’s approval, oh how things went downhill from there.
The film opens with a trap in progress (SPOILER ALERT – If you haven’t seen Saw 2 and ever plan on coming to it fresh then stop reading right now!). This involves a hapless victim having to gouge out his eye to retrieve a key to a death “mask” laden with spikes which will snap shut on him in a few seconds. Supposedly this is his poetic justice for having used his peepers to spy on people as an informant. I’m not ashamed to say I still think this scene and trap are incredible, you truly feel for the guy and put yourself in that horrendous position, the first thing through my mind being that I couldnt do it, pondered every time I see him reach for the eyeball with a blade. This also struck me as quite clever, it’s misdirection in a sense since you’re expecing an Un Chien Andalou style eye slicing but it doesnt happen, you’re left reeling as a viewer, disgusted by the idea of it but wanting it to happen so the poor guy can free himself, it’s almost cathartic and relieving when the mask snaps shut, reminiscent of a scene in Mask of Satan, a reference for the hardcore horror fanatics. Mr B looked nonplussed here but his opinion wasnt shared so on we ploughed.
We next launch into exposition setting up the cop characters, once Mr B had got over who both actors were (despite initial disbelief that it was Marky Mark Wahlberg’s brother and the chick from Starship Troopers) he concentrated, regretting it later but that’s to come. There was some hand wringing and excitement when we finally got to the meat of the story, meeting our protagonists all trapped in a house together. Lets deal with these sections of the film first...
Most of the traps Mr B found ridiculous, and it has to be said they dont hold up to logical analysis or scrutiny. I forgive a lot due to the fact the people here were clearly never meant to leave the first room but as Mr B pointed out with regards to a different matter its human nature not to sit around when you think you’re dying. That said he did visibly flinch twice, something I have NEVER seen him do as a hardened horror nut, due to his dislike of needles in one case, I forget the second.
It was during the more “police procedural” parts with Jigsaw and Detective Matthews that Mr B really expressed his distaste of what passed for a plot, completely disregarding the villains motivations and “logic”, its hard to disagree in part but I still find it cool at times in the series, and its not necessarily what they are about.
In conclusion not as good as I rememebered but still a worthy effort, some effective moments of emotional affectation, good plot beats and twists for me, and a few great traps and gore moments. My personal score...

*** (3/5)



MM

News/Reviews - Argento does giallo... badly!?


Hi all, MM back in action. Apologies if it seems like shameless plugging but I'm afraid I have to once again link to a piece on AICN. In it the contributor "Dr William Weir" has posted a first review of Dario Argento's Giallo from the Fright Fest in our fair country. Be warned the piece contains very minor spoilers and is not kind. This saddens me as it is the first time this movie has been brought to my attention and I would hope for better, Argento's giallo's are my favourite of his movies, preferable to the more crazy supernatural efforts, in fact Profondo Rosso (Deep Red) remains one of my favourite horror movies. I may still hold out some hope for this one, its a personal fan boy thing.



MM

Saturday 29 August 2009

News - Weekend Round-Up

Hi all. MM back on a particularly bored night, thought I may as well share a couple of new tidbits with you.
First of all the staff of AICN have posted their first official opinion on Rob Zombie's Halloween 2. I don't plan on linking to every one of these but this is a particularly good read, a very interesting piece and this guy Massawyrm seems to know what he's talking about and have as much love and respect for the genre as we here do.
Secondly as you'll see in the review if you check it out it's been announced that Zombie will be helming a remake of seminal horror "classic" The Blob, only apparently without the traditional representation of the titular amorphous monster, which he claims is too cheesy and wouldn't be accepted by audiences today. I really don't like this idea, The Blob never struck me as a great film anyway except in terms of a certain trashy B movie aesthetic (and an appearance by the legendary Steve McQueen in the original), a remake might be more suited to the likes of Robert Rodriguez or a director with similar sensibilities who isn't afraid to embrace the kitsch and corny. My opinion of the one Zombie film I've seen, Halloween, is well documented on the site and not wholly negative, but does lead me to expect the Blob to be a misunderstood shape-changing alien bounty hunter who was abused by his step parent from a warring species of intellectual inferiors. Still it is happening, you never know it could be worth a watch. Up to now Im totally indifferent to this news though, sorry fans.
MM

Wednesday 26 August 2009

Harper's Island - Coming Soon


Last post for today folks I promise.
Been seeing trailers for this new 13 episode show Harper's Island that's going to be coming to BBC Three (imported from the States of course). It looks a bit like a slasher film done as a tv series in that it is a murder mystery where the cast are picked off one by one. The viewer seemingly has to figure out the murderer along with the characters. Sounds very intriguing, keep an eye on your digital listings around Sept 6th and watch the trailer here...



or check out the spoiler heavy wikipedia page here

MM

Halloween 2 - First Reviews


Hi again. A reader and contributor over at Ain't It Cool who attended the premiere of Rob Zombie's sequel has posted their first review. Although the folks over at AICN seem to be united in their loathing of the original Zombie Halloween I have to say I quite liked it in a way. Likewise despite this review tearing the sequel a new one it oddly made me just want to go see it. I am a troubled horror geek. Find the piece by following the linkage below...

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/42155

MM

The Grudge 2 - Thoughts


Hi again all. Apologies for the lack of material of late but I have been coping with some personal issues which have kept me somewhat out of the emotional state for horror. Proving that good friends and the genre are always there for you though it was during this time that Mr B came round, bought me petrol station snacks and we decided to (finally) watch this, since I picked it up at the store where I work for a steal at just £2. To warn you I may be cutting it some slack due to my mood (which may skew things unfairly against the film).
I started off being quite harsh towards the movie, and to be fair there are a lot of cliches, hallmarked shock and scare moments (none of which are scary and only a couple of which are spooky, be warned early), some abysmal dialogue and some truly awful special effects and plot contrivances. Lets try and deal with the movie in a linear sense (in terms of what we see, the film is mind-messingly non-linear, even more so than the first).
The opening scene is like a more brutal and violent rehash of the seeming suicide moment from the first movie, immediately leaving you with questions and not allowing you to ease back into this world, perhaps a bit more work, a link to the previous characters (Sarah Michelle Gellar is utilised later), or at least an appearance by the ghostly protagonists (of which there are plenty later, mostly lacking in effective atmosphere but some genius).
We next flash to our new lead girl (or what passes for one). In this case it is Amber Tamblyn, the sister of Karen (S.M.G) from the first movie and, for seemingly NO reason, it is set up that she has a torrid relationship with their mother and her sister. It's possibly supposed to add depth, and we do learn later some guff about them wanting her to go to a certain college, it's really not in any way effective. This is probably a scripting issue if I had to place blame.
At this point my memory is hazy, I recall being ambivalent towards the messed up time structure, loving seeing some of the kills (though the cleverest moments are rehashes of those seen in the original US or Japanese Grudge (ghost under the covers, chasing you as the lights go out etc). There were some great ones though which Mr B can attest I loved, or at least admired, and I shan't spoil them.
The direction is fantastic, but I expected nothing less from the man responsible for single handedly overseeing two countries' versions of this story, one Shimizu Takashi (who created the story, writing the vastly superior, excellent and original Ju-On)
I hated the unnecessary (and disregarded) added exposition about why Kayako became how she was (her mother implanted her with evil spirits, no seriously), it is ridiculous, takes away some of the cool, supernatural mystique and is thrown away out of hand as untrue even within the film.
Likewise the film's ending, whilst maybe seeming arty merely leaves you thinking that the whole event was a bit pointless. I don't normally feel this way but here it jars that nothing has moved on, more people you could not really form a connection with have died and the curse has spread to another country, with the implication that it will continue to. Our lead "final girl" makes no attempt to solve this quandary as it has been so well set up as an unstoppable force so it feels like just rehashing and treading water. I fear for where the 3rd movie could take this as I don't see any logical progression.
However as I say I love how the whole thing looked, the narative and its unusual form did keep you hooked as you tried to work out connections etc, half of the cast do well and the moments are enjoyable enough. It's hard to give specific reasons why but I know I enjoyed this more than the last Friday the 13th, the last thing I reviewed. Maybe Im just not as protective a fan, or being generous. Or perhaps its just that Mr B and I agreed when setting up the site that we wouldnt allow half marks. In any case a solid, non-offensive example of the J-horror spook, done USA style, not bad but not especially good...

*** (3/5)

MM

Friday 21 August 2009

The Wolfman (2010) - Trailer


Hi again faithful fright fans.
Hope I'm not treading on any toes here but Mr B's previous post spurred me to finding this (it wasn't easy) and I thought I would share it with you. I'll be honest I've been acutely aware of this movie for a while but it hadn't grabbed my interest, until now. It's good in a way to see Universal revisit the old horror classics of their monster mashing heyday but I'm still not convinced the character can be shocking or relevant enough for a world that seems to have moved on beyond this, plus some of the cliche elements seem ridiculously hokey, I can't be the only one who thought of scenes being almost humourous that have been so readily parodied (the curse, the gypsy woman, the moors etc). That said I wasn't aware until now that the writer is someone I greatly admire, one Andrew Kevin Walker, and the film does look good, also check out that cast (Benicio Del Toro, Emily Blunt, Anthony Hopkins and Hugo Weaving) all completely stepping up to the top of their game, if this preview is any indication. Yup, atmospheric and evocative with genuine emotion, thanks Mr B, the geek radar is definitely registering interest now. Check it out for yourselves...



MM

Vile Things: Extreme Derivations of Horror - Book Review


Here's the blurb from the publisher first of all:
"Vile Things is the ultimate collection of extreme horror with 15 unspeakably gruesome, cringe-worthy, and sometimes disturbingly hilarious tales. and above all else an entertaining and damn good, fun read. The stories, most of which are previously unpublished, include a wide range of subjects: the Jersey Devil, zombies, sadistic Nazis, insatiable ghouls, perverted fishermen, a cult of Basilisk, tequila worms, and much more!"

So, does it live up to the hype? Is this the 'ultimate collection of horror' as it states? No, I'm afraid it is not. What Vile Things does offer is some tales the like of which you're unlikely to read elsewhere. They aren't all in the 'usual' horror mode - you won't find the usual serial killer or ghost in here I'm afraid.

What will you find then? You'll find dark tales of a worm that makes a relationship something which it definitely shouldn't be (The Worm, John Bruni), a monster reborn in the most disturbing of ways (Coquettrice, Angel Leigh McCoy) and one of the most disturbing stories I've read in a while - The Caterpillar by C. Dennis Moore.

Each story seemed to be quite short - for some this definitely hampered the narrative. One or two were actually part of a longer narrative explored in other tales - I'm not a fan of including these in short story collections, though I am sure that writers and publishers are.

I think the standout word here for the stories is strange - rather than vile. Well, perhaps that's not fair. Graham Masterton once again has done the business with his story of Sepsis (oh my god, what a way for two people to become one - and definitely not in a good way).

If you're new to horror fiction, don't read this first. There's a possibility you'll be put off by the disturbing nature of some of the stories. If, however, you're a massive fan of the horror short form, then you could do worse than take a look at this collection. For the record, I was one of the first in the UK to get a copy - shame it took me so damn long to get the review up!

The Wolfman - First Thoughts

Del Toro is the man - he is THE MAN. This trailer proves it. The fact is, it's made better by the fact that Anthony Hopkins is in it too. I didn't realise that it was actually going to be a period piece, which makes the idea behind The Wolfman even more exciting. I, for one, cannot wait to see this. An intense, gothic film is no doubt waiting to be enjoyed.

Pandorum - An Interview With Paul W S Anderson

Bloody Disgusting has an interview with the producer of Pandorum, Paul W S Anderson. Do I want to see this film? Oh yeah. Especially as 'Mr Event Horizon' is producing and no doubt will make sure there are plenty of shocks. It still looks like the monsters are weird orcs though.

Thursday 20 August 2009

Grotesque Banned...

The BBFC have taken the unusual decision (in this day and age anyway) of banning a movie. This time around, it's Grotesque that gets hit with the chopper, due to scenes of a sexually graphical violent nature. These scenes are apparently sustained throughout and were viewed as disturbing and unwarranted to the story.

Interestingly, I've not heard much about the film but the fact that it has received the ban does make me wonder what all the fuss is about. Apparently, Grotesque is a Japanese horror in the same sub-genre as Hostel - so no doubt torture-porn.

Monday 17 August 2009

The Final Destination - Trailer


Ok so the accidents spurring the invisble but deadly version of death into increasingly convoluted action are getting increasingly ludicrous, as is the Mouse Trap-style nature of each catastrophe, and the acting and plot. But lets be honest that's not what you're here for when you're watching these flicks. This is one of those series where fans (myself included previously, though not rabidly) feel a sense of ownership from the familiarity and it's cool to see how inventive and shocking (in a literal but perhaps not visceral way) the cast can be dispatched. As for the plot? lead? survivors? Does ANYONE care? Check out the trailer below if you're interested anyhow...



Its out in a couple of weeks and in eye popping 3-d in selected theatres, which should afford the visuals about 2 dimensions more than the writing or acting. One I probably won't be in line for, except out of morbid curiousity or boredom perhaps.

MM

Some Decent Horror Music - Slayer

What's the devil's music? Well, my choice tonight has been Slayer. A classic Bay Area metal band, they didn't seem to lose their way - not as much as Metallica anyway. They didn't make any poncey videos either.

Tracks like Raining Blood are bloody excellent in my opinion and go well with a horror film drinking session or two. I'll save that bit for the weekend or my upcoming days off!

Diabolus In Musica anyone? C'mon, it even has a creepy dude on the cover!

High Lane - Hell Yeah!

There's a new French film called High Lane that looks absolutely brilliant. Cliffhanger meets... well we don't know what yet, because the trailer doesn't really reveal very much at all.

See the three new trailers at Bloody Disgusting.

News - Straw Dogs (2010)

Hi again, Marvel Man here once more, on an especially prolific blogging day (did you all check out Jennifer's Body? Are you as psyched as I am? What did you all think?). This time around I have a bit of news which should be exciting for a fair proportion of horror and classic film fans.
Channel 4's digital teletext service is reporting that a cast is now in place for the, now official, remake of seventies controversial classic, and Mr B favourite, Straw Dogs.
They state that Superman Returns stars Kate Bosworth and James Marsden will take the lead roles, and be joined by genre veteran/bona fide legend/ Family Guy favourite James Woods (Videodrome).
The piece states:

"The Superman Returns star plays the wife of a Hollywood screenwriter - played by Marsden - who returns to her home town, only to find that life there is not as idyllic as she remembered.
Straw Dogs shocked audiences with its violence on release in 1971. The new film version is due out in 2010."


I shall refrain from commenting on the original film, as my views were made clear in a previous piece, but I will say that it is arguably influential, definitely infamous and an absolute favourite of Mr B who will no doubt comment further. From a solely casting standpoint I have to say Marsden is a favourite of mine, and Woods should be great in this role. Bosworth has never struck me as great but there may be a slight glimmer of potential, she certainly has a lot to prove, and live up to, here.

MM

Jennifer's Body - Preview and Green Band Trailer


I'll be honest the more I see or read about this movie the more interested I become, and not JUST because it has Mega(n) Fox in the lead role looking and acting pretty hot. Writer Diablo Cody seems to at least have an ear for authentic youth dialogue (though I haven't actually watched all of Juno) and knows how to milk the situations for humour or horror from the reality and the truth of being young and messed up (literally in this case).
For those not in the know the movie sees Fox's bitchy cheerleader, the hottest girl in school type, kidnapped by a Satan-worshipping rock band and possessed by a demon. As she goes on a killing spree, rampaging through the school's male population, her wallflower best friend (Mamma Mia's Amanda Seyfried, but don't hold that against her) must find her strength, kill her and despatch those responsible.
I'll admit it's not exactly looking original, the high school tropes and types seem a bit cheesy, and unrelatable potentially. But the piece seems to be quite intense and takes itself refreshingly seriously for the most part. And the trailer definitely looks quite cool, do seriously check it out (it's just below...), and see the Red Band version too if you can (embedding was disabled and some copies wouldn't play in the UK). Yup, I do definitely wanna check this one out...



MM

Pride and Prejudice... and Zombies.


Hey guys. An intriguing thing happened to me this weekend, whilst at work I got my hands on a copy of a book I've been interested in for a while named, you guessed it, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. What surprised me was, informing my partner in terror-blogging Mr B about it he wasn't aware of its existence. To that end I realised that a lot of fans of the genre may be unfamiliar with some circles, literary being one of them, so think of me as your own personal Newsnight Review, or perhaps Richard and Judy...
The book is co-written by an author named Seth Grahame-Smith, along with original author Jane Austen , who remains credited. The reason being that what Grahame-Smith has done is simply take the text of the original Pride and Prejudice and, in his own words, added "all-new scenes of bone-crunching zombie mayhem", expanding the book and "transforming a masterpiece of world literature into something you'd actually want to read". In other words the novel is, to over-simplify, merely Pride and Prejudice reimagined as a sort of Dawn of the Dead style zombie survival horror,... with romance... and a bizarre clash of subject and era.
The first noticeable thing about the book, having begun to read it, is just how close to the source text Grahame-Smith can be, the author himself has commented that in certain places where metaphors like "unmentionables" were deployed and references to enemies and fighting in wars utilised it was easy to see the story his way. There are added bits though, including bizarre subplots and a lot of familiar imagery and dialogue for zombie fans, and as mentioned some truly bizarre and admittedly hilarious clashes of genre. Initially I feared that some of this might get old, but up to now it has remained both engaging and hilarious, sample dialogue:

" It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains."

" The wedding took place, and no one other than Elizabeth suspected the bride's condition."

""My dear girl," said her ladyship. "I suggest you take this contest seriously. My ninjas will show you no mercy."

As an unusual experiment it seems to really work, one can absorb the original story, and see where it remains, quite easily. This leaves the reader feeling a bit intellectual but not bored and thrilled in fact by the overt horror tropes. It's not surprising that the book is a New York Times Best Seller and, of course, a Hollywood movie is in the works. In the end the title and truly amazing cover say it all, its up to the reader to decide if they will enjoy it, but this reader and horror fan is enjoying the expeience of working through it, and it puts a smile on my face.

MM

Sunday 16 August 2009

Zombieland - Red Band Trailer



My good friend Marvel Man will tell you that I'm not a fan of horror mixed with comedy - I'm not sure I get the point of it whatsoever. You can't become a quivering heap of terrified flesh and then be laughing your head off (pardon the pun) at the same time. Something in Zombieland seems to do it for me though. See what you think.

Note: This is the red band trailer. For adults only.

A Poltergeist Remake?

BloodyDisgusting.com has picked up on the story that MGM is moving along with a remake of the horror classic Poltergeist. Vadim Perelman has been mooted to direct (could be an interesting choice as he's an intelligent, thoughtful chap) and a tentative date of November 2010 has been given.

Poltergeist is the tale of a property development on an Indian burial ground which awakens an evil spirit. The original film remains a classic and a genre favourite of mine.

Saturday 15 August 2009

Fright Fest on TV - Film 4 line up





Okay, so I went searching as promised and discovered that the Film 4 schedules will be given over to horror double bills which they claim to be airing EVERY night at around 11pm and 1am until the end of the month. I'll be honest and say that's later than I was hoping, and I won't be catching the 1 in the morning movies. The listings tell a different story anyhow though, and there is a fair bit of repetition, but here's the available line up for both weeks:

Monday 17 August

23:00 Wolf Creek (2004) FrightFest season. When a backpacker's car breaks down, salvation arrives in the form of John Jarratt, but then events take a grisly turn. Adults only: scenes of horror/torture.

00:55 Reeker (2005) FrightFest season. David Payne's imaginative slasher in which a bunch of teenagers stranded in a deserted motel are hunted by a malodorous murderer. Strong language/violence.

Tuesday 18 August

23:05 The Hills Have Eyes(2006) FrightFest season. Ted Levine stars as the head of a family stranded in the desert where flesh-hungry mutant monsters wait... Very strong violence/sexual violence/language.

01:10 One Missed Call (2003) FrightFest season. Takashi Miike's horror in which teenagers receive calls from their future selves, predicting their violent deaths within 72 hours from supernatural forces.

Wednesday 19 August

22:40 Silent Hill (2006) FrightFest season. Christophe Gans' horror stars Radha Mitchell, whose infant daughter (Jodelle Ferland) vanishes in a town populated by zombies. Very strong violence/language.
That's right Mr B, a firm favourite, ripe for a re-watching!

01:00 The Cave (2005) FrightFest season. Bruce Hunt's horror film in which a group of cavers descend into a sealed cavern beneath a church, little realising what demons await their arrival...
Incidentally also being shown tonight.

Thursday 20 August

23:45 The Breed (2006) A group of teenagers, including Michelle Rodriguez, land on an idyllic island for a party weekend. But lurking in the woods are genetically enhanced hounds, hungry for blood...

01:30 Wolf Creek (2004)
Seems the season's taking a bit of a back seat today.

Friday 21 August

00:40 Cabin Fever (2002) FrightFest season. Eli Roth's horror film in which five college pals on a camping trip in the woods face a flesh-consuming virus. Who will survive? Contains offensive language.
Hmm the season almost an after thought, but an awesome film, one of my faves so in my opinion good enough to carry the night if only it wasn't on so late, if you have the DVD, like me, whack that in at a reasonable hour maybe.

Saturday 22 August

22:45 Donkey Punch (2008) FrightFest season. Oliver Blackburn's thriller has a group of teen girls and lads party on a luxury yacht. But then there's a violent death and witnesses must be silenced.

00:40 The House by the Cemetery (1981) FrightFest season. Italian horror in which a doctor takes over the work and house of a deceased colleague, little knowing a ghoul that feasts on flesh lurks in the basement.

Sunday 23 August

23:25 Isolation (2005) FrightFest season. On a failing farm in Ireland, Dan Reilly (John Lynch) agrees that his last cow can be used for DNA experiments. Cue bloody mayhem... Strong language.

01:15 The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

Monday 24 August

23:15 Lake Placid (1999) FrightFest season. When an environmentalist is eaten by something large hiding in a Maine lake, a disparate group of heroes (including Brendan Gleeson) gather to track it down.

00:50 Silent Hill (2006)

Tuesday 25 August

23:20 Diary of the Dead (2007) FrightFest season. George Romero's fifth zombie horror stars Josh Close as a student filmmaker, who finds himself shooting the goriest TV reality show ever. Strong language.

01:10 The Breed (2006)

Wednesday 26 August

00:40 Wilderness (2006) FrightFest season. Young offenders, on an outward bound course on a deserted island, become the target of a killer out to avenge his son's death. Strong language/violence.

Thursday 27 August

23:15 Final Destination 2 (2003) FrightFest season. Death is back to reap the souls of those who escaped a freeway pile-up. Can Ali Carter and Michael Landes save those marked for death? Violence/strong language.

01:00 Cabin Fever (2002)
It's like a personal DVD double bill tonight.

Friday 28 August

23:25 The Descent (2005) FrightFest season. Neil Marshall's chiller in which six women on a caving expedition find that once plunged into the depths, they are not alone... Strong language/violence.

01:20 The House by the Cemetery (1981)

Listings and descriptions courtesy the Channel 4 website (my italics), for full C4 series tv listings and info go to http://www.channel4.com/tv-listings/daily/2009/.

MM

Fright Fest - Tis the season to be scared


Hi all. In case you're unaware I just wanted to give a heads up that Film 4's 10th annual Fright Fest is about to get underway on August 27th, with some awesome guests, premieres, talks and classic horror on the big screen down at the Empire, Leicester Square. I myself won't be attending despite wishing I was (though I suspect Mr B wishes he were going even more) due to lack of money, holiday time or motivation but if anyone is heading down there I would really love to hear from you about the experience, the rest of us can find details over at the site:

http://www.frightfest.co.uk/

More relevant is the news, announced (or at least discovered by me via commercial) yesterday that Film 4 itself will be hosting a season of 15 days of horror films to coincide. For the record Film 4 is available and completely free via most satellite, cable and freeview services. Whilst I would probably lose my mind and enact the plot of one of these films if I were to try and watch them all (and for the sake of my sanity I shan't) I WILL endeavour to watch as many as I can, and especially those which interest me, and post reviews and comments, both short and long, in the very place you're reading right now.

The full line up is still unclear (but I will go searching and try and post as soon as I can) but the trailer/ad showed scenes from various interesting looking films and announced that the season starts on Monday with Wolf Creek. Again if you are watching along with any, or all, of the films at the festival, or on TV, feel free, nee encouraged, to post comments about it, and do enjoy...

Marvel Man signing off.

Tuesday 11 August 2009

Do You Want To See Orphan?

I really, really wanted to see Orphan. Then I read a review that didn't mention it contained spoilers and it totally ruined it for me. Will I still see it? Probably - Omen style evil child horror is always quite a freaky watch...

Monday 10 August 2009

Friday The 13th - Review

review by Marvel Man

First some back story, I really dig Jason Voorhees. In the pantheon of horror villains he is my definitive favourite. Maybe its the iconic image, the victimised and three dimensional nature, the inventiveness, the longevity. All I know is when it came to naming this site the Friday The 13th movies were what sprang to mind, so when a new one came out I was excited. I never got to the pictures so I watched it for the first time a couple of hours ago on DVD, seeing through a fan boys eyes. Make of that what you will going in and BEWARE YOU ARE IN SPOILER COUNTRY!!!
This movie opens with a cool but ridiculously brief scene which seeks to encapsulate the entire plot of the original Friday The 13th movie but dates it at the year of its release (1980), its disgustingly short at about one minute and a complete insult to fans, seeming like a bizarre attempt to keep the original film in continuity or disregard it entirely. In any case we get the customary sentence explaining Mrs Voorhees' motivations, Jason's history and that of Camp Crystal Lake. Quite simply more time should have been devoted to this, the stalk and slash cliche-by-numbers stuff that comes later seems painfully drawn out but this gets a few sentences in flashback. Bullshit!
We then move onto what seems like the second original movie replayed. Faceless teens talk weed and sex and the now adult burlap-sack wearing Jason kills them off in admittedly gruesome and inventive ways. This bit is also better than the majority of the movie solely for these cool death scenes and the cool way it posits the movies' back story as a sort of urban legend ghost story that turns out to be true despite nobody really believing it (allowing the characters to be clued in without it seeming stupid).
Sadly things go downhill from here. For some reason director Marcus Nispel thinks he's back on Texas Chain Saw territory and so you have sepia or blanket darkness filtering and obscuring everything, random hicks we meet who warn of bad things out there, exposition which serves no purpose outside of establishing stereotypes and a plot that, despite this being a suppposed "re-imagining" could be replayed verbatim from any Friday, hell any slasher. The only concession to this being a new start is when Jason ventures out of his old homestead to arbitraily claim a hockey mask in a scene that may as well have a flashing neon light reading "this is iconography". It makes no sense either as these towns folk say that he apparently only wants to be left alone. Bah.
The notable exception to this point of plot badness is the relatively engaging idea of Sam-or-Dean Winchester (you know the guy) set up as "final guy" and, in an unusual move, protectively seeking out his sister. Though this leads to cliche city as he chides the cops for being inept and tags along with the next group of teen-eotypes, angering the jerk, protecting the hot chick etc. Bizarrely as well he somehow finds his sister alive due to some gubbins about Jason thinking its his mom cos they look alike and she wears her pendant that she found earlier and frankly I can't be bothered to explain or care any further because its a totally ludicrous idea that serves no real, decent, sensible function and is clearly a plot purpose to drive you to the final showdown, tie events to what happened before in a cool way but with the single worst piece of dialogue of the decade ("Say hello to mommy...... in hell" as delivered with the panache of the infamous "mostly" speech in Aliens).
There are good points there if you really go looking (and I had to, I bought the DVD). The kills ARE great, never a missed opportunity and with some good twists, Jason's bait and switch new concept is great if only it hadn't clashed horribly with him being retarded (both within the plot back story and thinking his dead mother was alive and not aged). The film is also fun at times, and the mythology keeps it ticking and somewhat engaging.
The acting. Oh my, to call it wooden would be an insult to vibrant forests everywhere. Sam-or-Dean does ok but belongs on network television, still a step up from the catalogue models filling out the roles though. Jason is woefully, criminally miscast. Bring back Kane Hodder or Ken Kirzinger cos this Derek Mears guy does NOT get the dude at all, how can you act badly behind a mask with no dialogue? Oh he finds a way.
But I'm venting, the story isn't all that terrible, the pace is decent, the cast look great, there are gratuitous tit shots galore, a bunch of new killings... and sadly nothing new. The ending even replays that last shock from the original which is justifiably famous, its alright but none too shocking and great if its respectful but you can't help but feel it's as much about setting up an inevitable sequel. The DVD package is quite weak too, no explanatory commentary, a barely extended cut and some truly poor attempts at featurettes. As a whole one for die-hard fans to try and enjoy only. Sadly that includes this guy.

** (2/5)

Friday 7 August 2009

The Amityville Horror - Some Commentary

I'm talking about the original here, not the remake.

Marvel Man's mother kindly lent me the DVD (as well as making a very nice curry) and I couldn't resist watching it that very night.

I've always held the original film very dear to my heart. It was one of the first 'haunted house' movies I saw and it left me genuinely scared. I'm quite happy to comment that it has lost none of the charm and remains a better watch than the remake (Ryan Reynolds or not).

The storyline with the priest is scary, the unseen, unknown Jodie is scary, the blood down the walls and the sheer oddness, the more subtle touches, the flies, the cross turning upside down... All these make for some great elements.

I'm quite happy to say that I watched the original truly gripped. This brings me to a point I've mentioned before. Unless you are sure that what you can achieve is going to be better than the original (without resorting to cheap effects), then don't bother. I think it actually comes down to something that Marvel Man mentioned. If you've got a great story, you don't need to have whacked out visuals. Simple, subtle visuals can work just as well and The Amityville Horror is a case in point. A seminal, superb haunted house horror.



***** 5/5

Monday 3 August 2009

Video World Memories - Commentary


Hey guys, Marvel Man back after a week of getting internet repaired with a very traditional blogging post this time. Basically the inspiration for this came on my daily commute to work, the bus regularly going past a street of shops which used to include an old fashioned, quite charming video store called Video World. It saddened me to see that this particular store has been completely shut down and replaced with a bizarre, gaudy unisex salon. I don't want to get on my soap box about changing times or my protestation against this decision (and how sad it was to watch the place gradually fade away as it lost space and got edged out by new businesses) but I do have a lot of memories of the store, fittingly horror related so thought I would lament the place's loss by sharing them.
My very earliest recollections are of the nifty V.W boxes which were generic and pasted with movie stars, I would see them and know that they usually contained horror brought home by my parents or my sister to watch in other rooms, usually while I was sleeping (bar the one time my folks rented Ghostbusters 2 for me). Even when I didn't like horror somehow the icons of the genre on the boxes stood out, they almost became a horror signifier for me. Likewise my earliest fears and nightmares were when a Freddy cut-out was placed in the store's window to advertise the 3-d Nightmare (can't remember which, 6 I think, I believe entitled "Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare", ironically). This quite badly traumatised me, then about 9 years old, and put me off horror for a while sadly, I was clearly still too young.
It was some years later when I truly got into horror, kick started by finally watching the movie Scream on a video tape which I think may have been borrowed to my older sister by someone (weirdly I have no memory of who it belonged to or how I came into possession of it, just watching it and the sequel in our old flat). Spurred on by this good experience, having really enjoyed the film, I decided I would like to give slashers a go (I haven't looked back since lol).
Thus one night me and my best friend at the time, known simply as Browny, were deciding on something to do on a Saturday night. Being somewhat geeky guys the concepts of meeting girls, groups of people, going on dates or hanging around the streets were ruled out, and for some reason we didn't have enough money to hit our usual pubs. We were just turned 18 and bored and so I hit on the idea of checking out Video World for myself, now I was an adult I could enter those imposing racks of films and grab my own horror...
I had 10 pound in my pocket and the place offered two films for £5 so spurred on by boredom and nerves and limited by what I could see I chose to rent the movies Cherry Falls (as it seemed to have a Scream vibe) and Jason X (as a sci-fi geek discovering he loved slashers). The former is not as bad as you might think, enjoyable enough, surprisingly watchable and pleasant when viewed nostalgically but let down by some generic cliche, bad acting and a truly mental ending, which we found hilarious at the time (*** 3/5).
Which brings me neatly to Jason X. I'm aware of the films reputation, and couldn't claim to have discovered a classic piece of cine-art but high on popcorn, beer, cola and a fun night of horror cheese finding that flick was like discovering a hidden stash of sherbet flavoured m and m's. I still love it, despite knowing how awful it is, I admire the kitschness, the s.f gags, the lack of taking itself seriously and the tongue in cheek nature of such classic moments of a dispatch with twisting piece of metallic engine being greeted with the response "he got screwed!". The film is my personal guilty pleasure and for me **** 4/5, for everyone with taste probably * or ** (1 or 2/5). I received the movie from an old flat mate as a birthday gift a few years back and still own it, and watch it whenever I'm feeling down or slightly kooky.
So there we have it, not the first horrors I discovered but the first horror movie night I had, and my first big experience of stepping into this huge world, and I had Video World to thank for it. I have gone elsehwere since but never forgot their influence. I even went back the following week hoping to repeat my great night in and rented the movie Queen of the Damned. Perhaps that's when, for me, the place truly died.

Saturday 1 August 2009

REC 2 - Trailer 3



I'm telling you right now, you need to see this film when it comes out. Oh jeez. I'm stoked (for the first time in a while).

Mirrors - Some Comments

It's not every day when I watch horror - but I do try to make it most days :)

Joking aside, I'd wanted to see Mirrors for a while, but never managed to get around to seeing it at the cinema. I did catch it last night however and it appears to have some very good ideas with some bizzare execution (as well as an ending that I've seen in an Asian film some time ago (is this a direct remake?).

The basic idea is that Kiefer Sutherland is a cop waiting for re-instatement following some kind of incident (it hints at the idea that he shot his partner). He's got a tenuous hold on his family and it seems also his sanity, due to some strong anti-alcohol drugs he's taking. So, lots going on so far. It all jumps into the horror genre though when Sutherland's lead starts his new job as a security guard for a sprawling burned out old building. Suddenly, there are things in the mirror that he's seeing that really shouldn't be there. Ultimately, this brings a great evil and peril for the thing he cares for most - his family.

SPOILERLAND - LOOK NO FURTHER IF YOU'VE NOT SEEN THE FILM
For me, the most effective part of the film was when the character of Anna Esseker was introduced. The idea of her being possessed was actually quite a well thought out one, but it did bother me. Why would the demon wish to possess Anna again when it was clearly hugely powerful within the mirror?

Couldn't it go from mirror to mirror, or only to the mirrors in which a person had been exposed? Lots of questions left this section open ended, but the possession trope was a welcome addition to the film (I'm a huge fan of the possession horror sub genre).

Another thing that really bothered me was just how quickly his wife started to believe the whole thing. Complete change of attitude in a few minutes, and not because of compelling evidence either.

On the whole, Mirrors was a lot of fun, it just never quite lived up to the promise and actually seemed to be a bit of a strange mish-mash of various ideas. Perhaps it would have been more of a yarn had it focussed on one specific aspect of the story.

Stand out moment: The bath scene with Angela Carson.
Worst moment: The ending - not at all a surprise.

The Box Trailer

You've got to go watch the trailer over at Bloody Disgusting for 'The Box'. Disturbing, a man with half a face, high strangeness and more seems to be shown, alongside a foxy Cameron Diaz.

Check it out here
.